Published May 22nd, 2009
in Political Well Being.
How is it that the current regime supports independence for Kosovo, and the Palestinians, yet does not do so for Flanders, Scotland and the South? Is there a pattern here? What is it about Kosovo and Palestine that merits support and approval, whereas independence for Flanders, Scotland and the South is not supported. Even though there is a homogenous population in these areas, the empire does not support the independence movements in those areas. In fact the Hussein regime made it clear with the statement by Joe Biden that “Your independence, is irreversible, absolutely irreversible.” In a logical and consistent world, given that independence is not reversible for Kosovo, then it is ‘absolutely irreversible’ for other sovereign nations as well. Since such independence is not tolerable for the regime, then it is clear that the regime is illogical in its policies and therefore not coherent.
The current double standard shows that the regime has another agenda. Given that one of the few common factors that Palestine and Kosovo have in common is of a religious nature. Could it be that religion is the biggest factor is being considered “absolutely independent”, with some religions deserving of support and some deserving of oppression? (He says sarcastically, NOT this administration. It would not be so petty as to allow religion to mix with politics. You know they believe in the seperation of Church and State-UNLESS you have the right religion and you are seeking independence as a sovereign nation in selected parts of the world).
Liberty for Texas and the South
Flemish Independence, Joe Biden, kosovo, Kosovo Independence, Obama, Obama foreign policy, Palestine, Palestinian Independence, Political Well Being, Scotland, Scotland IndependenceIf you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
Although the International community recognized the Independence of Kosovo when some radicals issued a Declaration of Independence a year ago, the people of the region feel differently about the issue. The locally elected representatives consider themselves part of Serbia. Talk about a double standard, when the people of the Occupied South (including Texas) , Quebec and Scotland express a desire for Independence, with elected representatives, such actions are not recognized. The empire and other nation states do not play fair, act justly or even consistently with their policies. The principle of International Law are applied only when it is to their advantage. As we near the anniversary of Texas Indepence which was declared 172 years ago, it is a time to consider such proposals again. We are presently occupied by a people whose values, culture and policies are alien to those of Texas. Rather than self-reliance, they advocate dependence on government. Rather than allodial title to land, they advocate the right to tax land and income. Rather than let the people of Texas maintain their arms, the occupational government views the right to bear arms as a priviledge that they can monitor and remove at their choice. Rather than have freedom of choice with medical care, the occupational government advocates its control of private medical information and seeks to put limits on our health care. Rather than allow the parents of Texas to decide what values are taught to their children, Senators like Diane Fienstein are advocating that those rights be removed and given to the United Nations to make such choices.
The empire only recognized a nations soverignty when it is to its own advantage. They don’t just have a double standard, it is a triple and quadruple standard.
Free Texas!
J Murrah
Culture, Current Affairs, Free Quebec, Free Scotland, kosovo, Kosovo Independence, Political Well Being, Serbia, United NationsIf you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
