I have already been asked for my opinions on Judge Sotomayor. What I have seen so far is that the Hussein regime supports her, using the term ‘inspiring’. This is the same regime that jokes about people being audited by the IRS, believes the Constitution is 20 centuries old, and has visited 57 States. If a regime like that says she is inspiring, who are we to say otherwise, since by their own propaganda, they are smarter than the common people are.
Liberals view her as
1. Highly Qualified
2. She is a ‘trail blazer’ (editor-e.g. a loose canon)
3. She supports the working class
4. She supports first amendment rights (ed. Unless you are a blogger expressing your opinion as in the Doninger v. Neihoff case where she opposed free speech).
5. She ’saved’ baseball (she sided with the unions against the owners)
6. She embodies the ‘American’ dream
…etc.
(ed.-What I do not see is how she has shown reasoned and sound judgment, whether or not she will abide by the Constitution, or whether she will apply the law in a color-blind manner)
What this tells me is that she is bad news. When people like Spector, Snow and Lieberman support her, I am already suspect. I have little use for judges who are deemed ‘fair’ and ‘well qualified’. Those terms are often used to confuse the public.
When it comes to law, issues should be approached cautiously. We want a nation that is ruled by law, not the opinions of radical judges. In order to make a good ruling, judges need to study the principles of law, and uncover the legal truths presented in the case. Judges, by the nature of the material they consider must needs be conservative and well read in order to understand what is at stake in the cases presented before them. It is not a place for being ‘fair’. What is needed is ‘Justice’ and wisdom in discerning the issues. Consider how 60% of Sotomayor’s rulings have been overturned by the high court. Either the higher courts are out of touch or she is. If a judge had addressed the key issue of the case, the likelihood of being overturned must needs be small.
She is on record as supporting reverse descrimination, and being opposed to second amendment liberties. She is a member of La Raza (The Race) which is a group promoting one race’s agenda as its primary goal. (A person can not get more racist that that. In fact, in her opinion in the Ricci case she did not have the courage to take the proper legal stand and strike down a civil rights law that was an obstacle, instead she took a position to save the civil rights law. In other words, she is a judicial hack who wants to preserve the policies and systems in place rather than seriously consider what is good law) . She is an activist judge who believes that judges should dictate policy. Many of the pro-life groups are also opposed to her nomination. She is not a good choice if you want rule of law. Her selection is a clear indication of the values and direction of the Hussein regime.
Liberty for Texas and the South!
J Murrah
ALG Editor’s Note: William Warren’s award-winning cartoons published at GetLiberty.org are a free service of ALG News Bureau. They may be reused and redistributed free of charge.
PS-As typical of the propaganda machine, as more documentation comes out, Judge Sotomayor is NOT the brightest and the best. Her scores on standardized testing were below the levels normally associated with admission to college and law school. She refers to them as “sub par”. So once again the mainstream media and MoveOn.org have lied and misled the people about the qualifications of Judge Sotomayor.
PS. SCOTUS has overruled a Sotomayor opinion. As the investigation of her continues, 300 more boxes of her writings have appeared which gives the Senate more to work with.
activist judge, Constitution, Current Affairs, Doninger v Neihoff, La Raza, Political Well Being, SCOTUS, Senator Joe Lieberman, Senator Olympia Snow, Sonia Sotomayor
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
1 Response to “What about Judge Sotomayor?”