How is it that the current regime supports independence for Kosovo, and the Palestinians, yet does not do so for Flanders, Scotland and the South? Is there a pattern here? What is it about Kosovo and Palestine that merits support and approval, whereas independence for Flanders, Scotland and the South is not supported. Even though there is a homogenous population in these areas, the empire does not support the independence movements in those areas.  In fact the Hussein regime made it clear with the statement by Joe Biden that  “Your independence, is irreversible, absolutely irreversible.” In a logical and consistent world, given that independence is not reversible for Kosovo, then it is ‘absolutely irreversible’ for other sovereign nations as well. Since such independence is not tolerable for the regime, then it is clear that the regime is illogical in its policies and therefore not coherent.

The current double standard shows that the regime has another agenda. Given that one of the few common factors that Palestine and Kosovo have in common is of a religious nature. Could it be that religion is the biggest factor is being considered “absolutely independent”, with some religions deserving of support and some deserving of oppression? (He says sarcastically, NOT this administration. It would not be so petty as to allow religion to mix with politics. You know they believe in the seperation of Church and State-UNLESS you have the right religion and you are seeking independence as a sovereign nation in selected parts of the world).

Liberty for Texas and the South

Flemish Independence, Joe Biden, kosovo, Kosovo Independence, Obama, Obama foreign policy, Palestine, Palestinian Independence, Political Well Being, Scotland, Scotland Independence

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!