Barack Obamas first 100 days, Current Affairs, Political Well BeingIf you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
Archive for April, 2009
100 days of no accountabililty
Published April 29th, 2009 in Current Affairs and Political Well Being. 0 Comments Barack Obamas first 100 days, Current Affairs, Political Well BeingReconstruction III is officially underway!
Published April 29th, 2009 in Culture, Current Affairs and Political Well Being. 0 CommentsThe third reconstruction of the South is now underway. The head of the Obama regime said, “we’ve begun the work of remaking America.”I do not know how much clearer it can be. His regime is redesigning and socially engineering the nation to force us into a mold of someone else’s making. The main difference between this reconstruction and previous ones is that this one involves all the States.
What has he done so far:
1. Redefined what is social deviancy. Many disorders (about 30) that were previously considered wickedness and perversions are now protected by hate crimes legislation.
2. Created a youth labour corps. In a move reminiscent of the WPA or Nazi Youth, the youth volunteer program has been approved and will soon be implemented. His program does not limit the volunteers to youth, but also includes all ages.
3. Restructured the financial structure of the nation. He has effectively nationalized some of the larger banking institutions. If this occurred in a Latin American nation, Americans would be upset that the nation took over private businesses.
4. Restructured the social fabric. He has expanded and added depth to the social welfare network. This will create a dependent class of subjects that will remain loyal to him and his regime.
5. Saddled the nation with historic levels of indebtedness. Besides creating a burden on future generations, such a measure insures that his policies will remain in place LONG after he is out of office. The debt also transfers influence and control over policies to those parties holding the debt. In essence, big international banks and China have more influence on US policy than do the his American citizens subjects.
6. Created an environment that is hostile to free speech. In the present social environment when one is critical of the Hussein regime, they are suspect of being un-american or divisive.
7. Created a new social milieu. The new social milieu focuses on inclusiveness rather than celebrating the distinctiveness and uniqueness of our heritage. He has redefined what it means to be an American.
8. Proposed plans to restructure the healthcare system. While spewing rhetoric about making it more affordable, the plan seeks to expand government provided healthcare and then set limits on what services are available (e.g. ration the services). The restructuring amounts to a nationalization of the healthcare industry.
9. Created a massive database on the physical, psychological and mental status of the entire population of the nation. With the legislation on healthcare information, the regime has created the groundwork for a massive database of the citizenry subjects.
10. Positioned people in his cabinet that are dedicated to the reconstruction program. The new program will create new definitions of family, healthy lifestyles, and quality of life. The reconstruction also seeks to place the nation under greater authority of international bodies and treaties. The trade off is the loss of liberty in the name of international prestige. His programs seek to level the playing field of the American people with the world, not by elevating other nations, but by lowering (redefining) the standard of living and quality of life to the levels experienced in other nations.
11. Plans to seize control of the national power grid.
12. Plans to seize control of the national communication networks.
13. Plans to expand the imperialistic military actions in other nations.
14. The Hussein regime demands that the nation respect our enemies, dictators (Chavez), ethnic cleansers (Turkey and the Armenian genocide) and oppressors.
15. The Hussein regime has led the charge to have the citizens surrender their religious convictions and teachings regarding immoral behavior.
16. The Hussein regime has set an example of bowing before foreign emissaries.
17. The Hussein regime supports positions that are pro-death, and expects the American people to support their stance. (stance on promoting abortion)
18. This regime expects the citizens subjects to provide loyalty and trust to it, when it has already betrayed what trust it was given.
Make no mistake, this third reconstruction is well underway. Here in the South, we have already experienced two reconstructions. One would assume that the powers that be would give up and leave us alone.
Reconstruction by its very nature seeks to rebuild a people and society into unnatural forms that did not develop on their own. Reconstruction seeks to make the citizens subjects have unquestioned loyalty to the regime and its policies. They are to accept the changes and policies on the basis of the mantra “it is in the best public interests”, or “it is good for the nation”.
Reconstructions have taken place in history before, when an occupational nation seeks to reshape a society to fit its pre-determined mold. In doing so, the occupational force will try to justify its actions with a series of myths. Myths that justify its actions and create an illusion. The myths seek to rewrite history, culture, values, mores, and heroes so that it fits the pre-determined mold.
Although this reconstruction has technological tools at its disposal, they also have an arrogant ignorance of culture, history and values that insures the failure of this third reconstruction effort.
Liberty for Texas and the South!
J Murrah
China, China holding debt, Culture, Current Affairs, Medical healthcare information, nazi youth, Obama adminstration accomplishments, Obama healthcare, Political Well Being, reconstruction, social deviancy and Obama, WPA and Obama, youth labor corps, youth labour corpsIf you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
What Obama healthcare really means
Published April 29th, 2009 in Health and Political Well Being. 1 CommentSome political pundits questioned the Obama regime on how they can implement their health plan without raising the costs. The answer to that question is now coming out. It seems that in the opinion of the Obamatons, America uses too much healthcare. Once they take it over (e.g. socialized medicine) the plan is to cut services provided by 30%. This is the same health care plan that the administration and its fellow travellers are attempting to ramrod through CONgress as you read this. The latest plan is to use some proceedural maneuvers so as to avoid debating the many provisions of the plan in the scrutiny of public disclosure. In an effort to placate the peasants, weekly updates on healthcare reform are being distributed by the nanny government of the Obama regime. The regime is full of sneakiness and weasel ways. As the Good Book says, “by their fruits ye shall know them”. In the case of the Obama regime, they are full of lies, promoting wickedness by approving sinful lifestyles, questioning the veracity of the Word of God, playing god in dealing with Israel, being busybodies with other nations, purposefully socially reingeneering the social fabric of the nation, manipulating the media, nationalizing major industries and sectors of the economy. The empire marches on in the image of the national socialist party of Germany, complete with symbols, slogans, anti-jewish sentiment, push for breaking down social differences, etc. While the leader of the regime gives eleoquent talks, the apparachniks are busy dismantling freedoms and contructing a larger political machine.
America! The Obama regime thinks you use too much healthcare. They will now fix the situation by cutting back on healthcare. (Who made them doctor?). The arrogance of assuming they know best concerning childcare, education, medicine, and in business is astounding.
Liberty for Texas and the South!
J Murrah
healtcare, Health, healthcare reform, how will obama healthcare benefit me, Obama care, Obama healthcare reform, Political Well Being, use of healthcare resourcesIf you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
In 1918 a flu epidemic swept the nation and the world. In that epidemic, between 20 and 100 million people died. At that time the flu was known as the Spanish flu due to its initial outbreak in Spain. The latest flu is being called “swine flu”. Some scientists are objecting to this label since it is not primarily a swine based virus, nor is it caught from eating pork. If the old common sense nomenclature were used, it would be called the “Mexican Flu”. I suspect that the powers that be do not refer to the Mexican flu with those terms due to political correctness and the ramifications that action would have to be taken at the border to prevent its spread. Despite the ramifications, some parties in other parts of the world have more cajones than the present administration and are already calling it the Mexican flu.
One of the best articles I have seen on the matter is the one done by Dr. Ron Paul. He addresses concerns about how the government is not a physician and needs to stay out of the medical field. The nanny government wants to make our medical decisions, safety decisions, economic decisions, etc., all without our permission in “our own best interest”. At that time, more Americans died from the vaccinations than from the flu itself. If that was the state of affairs then, can you imagine the mass vaccination they are talking about now? If programs like the one touted in Gillespe County where they brag that the whole county can be vaccinated were implemented, can you imagine the loss of life? The government was wrong in 1976 about all the dangers of the swine flu at that time and we will see if things are better now.
Meanwhile, behind the curtain, CONgress is preparing to vote on the administrations huge budget. They are finding ways to avoid having floor debates and to ramrod the package through, including healthcare concerns. Government healthcare was bad before Obama took office, and only stands to get worse.
Liberty for Texas and the South!
J Murrah
Culture, Current Affairs, Gillespe County vaccination program, government healthcare, government vaccination programs, Health, Mexican flu, Obama budget, spanish flu, swine flu, swine flu of 1976If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
Freedom of speech is dying in Florida
Published April 29th, 2009 in Web/Tech, Culture and Political Well Being. 0 CommentsThe State of Florida is the latest example of how freedom of speech is dying. In two separate incidents the freedom to speak freely are plainly under attack. In the first incident, the Governor signed into law a new bill removing terms that were considered “offensive” and promoting stereotypes. Such reduction in freedoms is not what is needed at this time. In the second incident in Sarasota, a teen (Dan Azeff) was shot in front of the movie theatre after he displayed a Confederate flag. The shooter argued with Dan, insinuating that he was a racist prior to the shooting. After shooting Dan, the second teen, Michael J. Mitchell ran off. It took the local police two hours to locate the shooter who was later arrested at his home.
Such incidents illustrate that changes are occuring in the culture. The purging of words from the vocabulary is a tactic used in Nazi Germany as part of thought control. With increasing frequency such tactics are occurring in the South. These incidents occur in conjunction with the unveiling of a depiction of Obama as a Christ like figure. Prior to its unveiling, the artist canceled the display due to the strong reaction from the public to its display.
Such incidents of censorship are likely to become more frequent if the nominated regulatory czar (White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs) is allowed to have his way. The nominee, Cass Sunstein, who is a college friend of Ben Barack Hussein Obama (aka Barry Soretero) is one that advocates the ‘fairness doctrine’. He considers the internet ‘undemocratic’ since its users can filter out information they do not want to view. He wants sites to display links to opposing opinions. There is even talk of a ‘civility check’ on emails that would wait 24 hours before they are sent.
Make no mistake, freedom of speech is under asault. This time it is not just a matter of words being forbidden, the stakes are much higher. Ask Ben Azeff about the cost of free speech. His civil rights were violated when another teen encroached on his physical being with a gun (now why a teen would carry his gun to a movie theatre is another matter that I don’t understand).
Liberty for Texas and the South!
J Murrah
Barack Obama, Cass Sustein, Confederate flag, Culture, Dan Azeff, Fairness doctrine, freedom of speech, Michael J Mithcell, Political Well Being, Sarasota Florida, State of Florida, Web/TechIf you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
Perry and Liberty, the second verse
Published April 27th, 2009 in Culture, Current Affairs and Political Well Being. 0 CommentsGovernor Rick Perry remains in the news concerning secession. In the latest bout, he will be hosting a forum to discuss and review the Ben Barack Hussein Obama regime’s first 100 days. The tradition of evaluating Presidents based on their first 100 days performance goes back to the tyrant FDR. The idea did not originate with the founds, but with the american dictator FDR. Perry’s rhetoric now includes references to the Declaration of Independence, which is a step in the right direction. Bear in mind that the States created the Union, and not vice-versa. One of the lies foisted on the nation from the Lincoln regime is the idea that the Union preceded the States. He used that idea to push through many items in his agenda.
So, Perry is indeed singing the second verse of song of liberty. I like many of the things I hear, which could bode well for Texas. What is missing is action. How far will he go? At this point, he has still not put the plaques back on the State Court Building. Going back to the premise of look at what they do rather than what they say, Perry has not taken action on many items. When he invalidates federal mandates, disregards new federal regulations, and takes firm stands against them, then we can believe what he says. I am grateful that he has opened the topic of secession in discussions. The American political system needed to discuss it, along with nullification.
He talks about life on the other side of the Rubicon, but will he actually cross the Rubicon?
Liberty for Texas!
J Murrah
100 days of Obama regime, Culture, Current Affairs, Declaration of Independence and Perry, FDR, Lincoln, Political Well Being, Rick Perry, secession for TexasIf you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
An article worthy of reading recently appeared in the American Spectator. In the article, Peter Ferrara raises the question of whether the Obama regime will seize the radio stations next. He points out that the Fairness Doctrine merely lays the groundwork for taking over the communications network.The FCC already has the power to taken them over at the direction of the executive branch. When the regime controls all the media outlets, it will be challenging for the people to obtain the news and information they need.(Hey, the Lincoln regime and the FDR regime did this also. Since the Husseing regime patterns itself after these tyrants, it follows that such a stunt is concievable)
History shows that one of the methods which communists use is to seize the communications networks and use them to monopolize the information given to the populace. By keeping the populace in a constant state of fear (chronic terror is the term often used), they eventually wear them down by creating a sense of isolation. The communists make the moral people feel like they are alone. It is a form of deception where they portray themselves as the saviors of the people.
If we look at the plight of another independence movement, the Vlaams Belang in Flanders, we might obtain a glimplse of what is to come. In the latest actions there, local book stores have refused carrying ANY books by authors associated with Vlaams Belang. Bear in mind that the regime specifically forbade any member of Vlaams Belang to watch the innaugaration at the American embassy in Belgium.
Liberty for Texas!
J Murrah
control of media, Current Affairs, FCC regulations, Obama and the FCC, terrorism and the media, Vlaams Belang, Web/TechIf you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
It’s time to take notes folks. In the coverage on the secession question, many of the CONgress critters see it as a joke and discredit the concept.
Among those joking and ridiculing the idea are:
“It’s known as a joking matter up here,” said Representative Gene Green, D-Texas (29th district).( I am sure those people in Pasadena do not think it is a joke!)
“That’s not going to happen,..We are interdependent. To secede; it’s the wrong thing. Representative Solomon Ortiz, D-Texas (27th District)
Lloyd Doggett, D-Texas (25th District), laughed at the suggestion of commentator Bill Press, who advocated that Attorney General Eric Holder should prosecute Perry for treason.
“I think the governor got carried away,” said Representative Charlie Gonzalez, D-Texas (20th District)
Representative John Carter, R-Texas (31st District), a former district judge said “It is a Texas myth that we obtained the right to secede” when the Republic of Texas was incorporated into the union, he said. Texas was independent from 1836 to 1845, when it became the 28th state.” (Perhaps it is since his district includes the army base at Killeen that he is so opposed to secession). Carter needs to read some factual history. Apparently he is victim of the polically correct versions. Texas almost exercised the right to secede when the CONgress in violation of the Constitution admitted New Mexico which contained portions of Texas. Even thouth the Constitution prohibits the creation of new states from other states, it did not stop Congress from doing so with West Virginia and New Mexico did it? Congress took Texas serious when they threatned to leave. The Texas v. White SCOTUS case does NOT prohibit secession.I do not know how much clearer it can be–Secession is a legal option. It is not illegal, it is not treasonous, it is not rebellion.
It is clear that these men were likely educated in government schools where secession is presented as against the law. Former district Judge John Carter should have known better since he is a judge, but apparently he reads the cliff notes of legal cases and had not researched the secession issue.
Bear in mind that many of these people have voted for the stimulus package and the regime’s other programs. They are not loyal to Texas or its people. They want to feed at the federal trough instead of protecting the people from the federal government.
If you live in one of these districts (20th, 25th, 27th, 29th or the 31st Congressional districts) remember that your elected representative sees the soverignty of Texas as a joke. They are not standing with Texas against the abuses of the federal government. Sure they are bringing money back to their districts, but it has strings attached. They have written checks that draw on your children and grand-children’s earnings and show no remorse. Ortiz and Gonzales voted with the democratic party and its agenda 100% of the time in the last Congress. Green and Doggett were not far behind at 97% and 96%.
There are many scalawags in the Imperial City, and Texas definitely has its share. A scalawag is someone who sells out their state and their people.
If you live in Ron Paul’s district, you can thank the Lord that you do. He is one of the few who were not laughing and went on the record for it. There are some other good Congressional Representatives from Texas who have not sold out the State of Texas and its people, but they do not include Doggett, Green, Ortiz (who also voted for the banker bailout), Gonzales or Carter.
You will need to keep an eye on the hired hands. They get more than a little squirly when they visit the Imperial City.
Liberty for Texas!
J Murrah
25th Texas Congressional district, 27th texas congressional district, 31st texas congressional district, Current Affairs, Political Well Being, Representative Charlie Gonzales, Representative Gene Green, Representative John Carter, secession and US representatives, Solomon Ortiz, Texas Congressional district 20If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
Don McLeroy: Texas hero
Published April 23rd, 2009 in Books, Science, Culture and Current Affairs. 0 CommentsIn some of the recent State Board of Education Meetings and the Texas Senate, Don McLeroy of Bryan, Texas has come under fire. McLeroy is the appointed head of the State Board of Education. The reason he has come under fire is that he dares to question the theory of evolution. He is a key mover and shaker when it comes to the texbooks used in Texas schools.
His critics dislike his insistence that scientific theories be presented as theories. The critics claim that students in Texas will be hurt by such an approach. (Gee, I thought in science that theories were supposed to be debated. Never mind the great debates over spontaneous generation, earth cycles, Plutonists versus Catastrophists, etc.). The self-appointed, self-righteous critics of McLeroy want the children indoctrinated rather than exposed to true scientific debate. Although scientific debate spurred many advances in science over the centuries, the evolutionists will not hear of such heresy-they want SCIENCE-so called!). One of the leaders amoung his critics is the “Texas Freedom Network“. Don’t let the name fool you. The name is Texas Freedom Network, yet their agenda is ‘mainstream moral values’, oppose abstinence-only sex education, and encourage stem cell research.
(Hint: When dealing with liberals/socialists, you must reverse everything they say in order to comprehend what is actually going on. In the case of the Freedom Network, they want indoctrination in theories rather than science, they want freedom from the values that have been a part of Texas culture and wish instead to mainstream the children of Texas. Turn on the TV. If you want the mainstream values of Obama, Paris Hilton, and other popular figures, then the Freedom Network and its values are for you. If you want values of family, faith and liberty, then the Freedom Network is not for you. Recall that Democratic Governor Miriam Ferguson (and first female Governor) protested LOUDLY at the very suggestion that evolution be taught in Texas schools. She said, “I am a Christian mother and I am not going to let that kind of rot go into Texas textbooks“.)
The opposition is referring to McLeroy’s stance as ‘fiction science’. His leading critic is State Senator Eliot Shapleigh of El Paso. Never mind that McLeroy has a electrical engineering degree and is a dentist by profession, the Shapleigh, who is a lawyer, believes he ‘knows’ what is best for Texas students. He also believes he knows what is best for Texas diners, by using the law as a sledge hammer and make the use of trans-fats illegal in Texas. Yup! Shapleigh is qualified to address both the science taught in school and what is served at restaurants. It amazes me how when a lawyer gets elected to office, they automaticallyview themselves as experts on many different issues, and encroach on other’s business in an arrogant manner.
Liberty for Texas!
J Murrah
Books, Culture, Current Affairs, Don McLeroy, Eliot Shapleigh, Miriam Ferguson and evolution, school textbooks, Science, science and evolution, Texas Freedom NetworkIf you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
New Poll on Texas Secession
Published April 23rd, 2009 in Culture, Current Affairs and Political Well Being. 1 CommentThe Daily Kos has posted a new poll that addresses the secession question. The results are worth taking a look at. The Republican voters are split 48-48 on the secession issue. Quite interesting. Here is part of it worth a closer look-see:
QUESTION: Do you think Texas would be better off as an independent nation or as part of the United States of America?
| US | IND | NOT SURE | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALL | 61 | 35 | 4 |
| MEN | 57 | 39 | 4 |
| WOMEN | 65 | 31 | 4 |
| DEMOCRATS | 82 | 15 | 3 |
| REPUBLICANS | 48 | 48 | 4 |
| INDEPENDENTS | 55 | 40 | 5 |
QUESTION: Do you approve or disapprove of Governor Rick Perry’s suggestion that Texas may need to leave the United States?
| APPROVE | DISAPPROVE | NOT SURE | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALL | 37 | 58 | 5 |
| MEN | 42 | 54 | 4 |
| WOMEN | 32 | 62 | 6 |
| DEMOCRATS | 16 | 80 | 4 |
| REPUBLICANS | 51 | 44 | 5 |
| INDEPENDENTS | 43 | 50 | 7 |
Demographics
| MEN | 288 | 48% |
|---|---|---|
| WOMEN | 312 | 52% |
| DEMOCRATS | 199 | 33% |
| REPUBLICANS | 234 | 39% |
| INDEPENDENTS/OTHER | 167 | 28% |
| 18-29 | 102 | 17% |
| 30-44 | 204 | 34% |
| 45-59 | 198 | 33% |
| 60+ | 96 | 16% |
| WHITE | 390 | 65% |
| BLACK | 77 | 13% |
| HISPANIC | 115 | 19% |
| OTHER | 18 | 3% |
Methodology
TEXAS POLL RESULTS – APRIL 2009
The Research 2000 Texas Poll was conducted from April 20 through April 22, 2009. A total of 600 likely voters who vote regularly in state elections were interviewed statewide by telephone.
Those interviewed were selected by the random variation of the last four digits of telephone numbers. A cross-section of exchanges was utilized in order to ensure an accurate reflection of the state. Quotas were assigned to reflect the voter registration of distribution by county.
The margin for error, according to standards customarily used by statisticians, is no more than plus or minus 4% percentage points. This means that there is a 95 percent probability that the “true” figure would fall within that range if the entire population were sampled. The margin for error is higher for any subgroup, such as for gender or party affiliation.
Culture, Current Affairs, Daily Kos, Political Well Being, Rick Perry, secession in Texas, secession poll, Texas better off as an independent nationIf you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
