Noose: acceptable speech or hate speech?

My how things change when one mixes politics with free speech. In the aftermath of Jena, even the display of a “noose” was defined as ‘hate speech’. When a conservative figure like Sarah Palin is hanged, it is deemed acceptable as Halloween decoration. The police refuse to consider it hate speech. Where is “Kerosene Maxine” (Watters) when such an expression of ‘hate speech’ is displayed? Although she is a CONgress critter from California, she is silent on that issues, and instead focuses on what is going on in Detroit, which is not her State.

The tune concerning hanging people in effigy suddenly changes when the effigy hanged is Barak Hussein Obama.  When Barak Hussein Obama was hanged in effigy, those involved were arrested!  Critics of the incident used the word ‘disgusting’ to describe their reactions to the effigy. It is shameful that law is enforced for conservatives, but not for those of the socialist persuasion. This is not justice! This is not rule of law, this is mob law.

Threats of violence are not the way to persuade people to one’s point of view. If such displays represent the feelings of the populous, tensions are high. The double standard of the media and culture architects of political correctness are clearly visible in these incidents.

Free Texas from such hypocrisy. If nooses are not to be tolerated, let it be. If they are to be tolerated, then do not outlaw them and refer to them as ‘hate speech’.

Free Texas!

J Murrah

Technorati , , , , , , ,
Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Fark
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • SphereIt

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!



http://rpc.technorati.com/rpc/ping