Archive for July, 2007

Knowledge is Power-The Federal Search Commission and the Matrix

Published July 31st, 2007 in Web/Tech. 0 Comments

There is a great deal of truth in the adage that "knowledge is power’. With the advent and expansion of the internet, there has been an expansion of knowledge, and in our ability to access knowledge. The Empire knows that knowledge is power as well. Their construction of massive data bases and psy-ops simulators Real-Life Matrix simulator show their intent to use power as well. The empire also knows that with browsers, we can often access and categorize information as never before. With that in mind, there are already efforts afoot to limit what browsers can do and can access Plans to limit search engines . I no longer ask the question "What will they think of next?" because they come up with the wildest ways to exercise control over us. Use your search engines while you can. Set up databases on key pieces of information. Leviathan does not like accountability. Knowledge and the Spiritual authority of scripture are two things that the Empire despises. They do not want accountability for their actions.

The Yankee empire limited the peoples access to information in the War between the States, in the Spanish American War and in both world wars. What makes you think that they will change now. Recall that in Texas, news of the approaching 1900 storm, that caused so much loss of life was censored by Federal authorities in the recently seized island of Cuba. Had the weather information been allowed to be shared, many lives would have been spared. Also in 1943, a hurricane ripped through Galveston and La Porte, causing great destruction and not a word of warning was given to the people, because of government censorship. Given the the best predictor of future behavior is past behavior, the past behavior of the Yankee empire is such that regard for the loss of life in Texas is low.

Knowledge is power, and that power has often been used against Texas and Texans.

Free Texas!

J Murrah

No Tags

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Brimstone and Political Correctness

Published July 30th, 2007 in Economic Independence. 0 Comments

While recently touring the old British fort known as "Brimstone Hill", in one of the rooms was a display concerning the American Revolution. On reading it, it became clear that political correctness is not limited to the formal Empire, but it stretches into other nations. They claimed that the American Revolution was a "equality" and the struggle to achieve equality. The American Revolution was about liberty, and throwing off the yoke of English despotism. By changing what the American Revolution was about, you change peoples perception of history and nations. Since the site once belonged to a British colony, I thought that there mighty be some mention of the despotism of the Empire, but….no way.

I guess since the queen had visited the site and it was now a world heritage site, that they had to be careful not to offend the UN or other nations with the truth. The truth was it was a fortress built by an imperial power that wanted to hold onto its control and maintain world domination. Other nations challenged that power and domination through war. The greedy mercantile system may have brought Britain great profits, but many lives were lost in fighing and defending such massive fortresses.

How does this relate to the South? I’ll tell you. The Empire is spending billions of dollars building a massive embassy in Baghdad. There may be talks of pulling out, but the reality is they have a massive real estate investment and they are not going anywhere soon. This is similar to the British investment at Brimstone Hill.

The British empire sought to control trade in sugar and other commodities throughout the world. In other words the empire went to war for corporate and market interests. The Yankee empire also fights wars for global corporate monopolies. If there is a profit to be made, rest assured that American troops will be there. This is why we are in Iraq and Afghanistan, and why we were not in Nigeria, or to a large degree in Darfur. This is why the empire allows some nations to conduct genocides, while others are interfered with. All the talk about equality looks nice on museum displays, but it is not reality. The reality is that war is driven by attempts at monopolizing trade and maintaining control.

The lessons of the true Brimstone Hill have many modern applications, yet the nations of the world are too busy with political correctness to learn them. The sooner we get out of the empire the better for out children and our future.Img_8328

The fortress of Brimstone Hill-A World Heritage Site

Free Texas!

J Murrah

No Tags

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Secession lessons from the Caribbean

Published July 29th, 2007 in Uncategorized. 0 Comments

How is it that the island of Nevis is pursuing  secession and making headway  on the matter and here in Texas it has not happened? 

Nevis is an island that is currently in a federation with the island of St. Kitts. The government of the federation is on St. Kitts. Since it is the larger of the two islands, it dominates the legislature. Nevis often does not receiving funds for its needs from the federation. They have often had to ‘go it alone’, even though the other island takes in revenues from taxes, tourists, etc., none of what they take in is shared between the islands. The Federation has a long history of ignoring the needs of Nevis.

Consider Texas. Do we receive our share of the funds contributed to the Yankee government. Consider all the fuel taxes, income taxes, postage, school taxes and other taxes. What is the likelihood that we receive what the same percentage that was contributed? Not likely.  Consider what the Congress critters have spent money on-things like foreign aid, welfare and other financial programs that they were not given the authorization to spend on. They took on that authority without a valid contract with the people or the states to do so. They operated outside the law, as they continue to do so.

Consider the issues in Congress. Are our voices heard? When the issues important to Texas are considered is action taken? Are the borders with Mexico secured? Do we receive a proportional share of tax dollars for border patrol? Does the Congress consider Texas sensibilities concerning morals,guns, religious issues or values taught in the government indoctrination centers?  Texas sensibilities are often ignored or purposely overruled by federal courts. It is not by accident that Roe v. Wade, Lawrence v. Texas, and other important legal decrees were imposed on Texas and the nation. When the Imperial judges slap down Texas, they are slapping down the values of all Southrons.

If we had been truly educated that when we see places like the island of Nevis clamoring for independence for  less that what has been done to Texas, we would be clamoring for secession as well. In the last secession vote, there were 63% in favor of seceding from St. Kitts. They needed the required 67%. When the next vote comes, it is likely that they will be a new nation. If the small island nation of St. Kitts has the courage to allow Nevis to vote on whether or not to stay in their union, then perhaps the Feds could learn something from that Caribbean nation and consider allowing the Southron states to at least vote on secession.

For Texas,

J Murrah

No Tags

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Texas College History Courses

Published July 26th, 2007 in Uncategorized. 0 Comments

With two sons in college, I hear what is happening in the classrooms. In covering American history, I barely recognize the events, which they present as history. Just in terms of time spent, the typical history course spends 1-2 lectures addressing the evils of slavery and less than one lecture covering the events of the War Between the States. When addressing the topic of slavery, they throw out the usual arguments about the institution. They do not provide numbers or solid data on the numbers of free blacks. Little is mentioned of the Cherokee Indians having slaves on the trail of tears. I was proud of one of my sons who pointed out that the required text on slavery in Texas was based on a events in one county. He went on to state that it was a statistically small group and that you could not apply what the text said to the population at large, although the instructor regarded the book as "the authoritative book on slavery in Texas".

Other travesties included Calhoun and James Knox Polk being maligned and the whole political questions associated with secession are ignored.

With the internet, you can see college syllabus online and see what they cover in the courses.

Here is one from Temple University.Temple University Syllabus. Here is Ole Miss Ole Miss History Syllabus . You can look up others and see for yourself. I was astounded in looking at the history from 1877 on. In some of those courses, the students are assigned to read Bellamy’s book. If you choked on the pledge of allegiance, you will find it almost impossible to breathe in reading Bellamy’s socialist views. Given that this is the kind of material students are taught, it is no wonder they do not have solid answers for the problems of today. They have no solid foundation to answer the critics who attack southern culture. The need for Southern scholarship and apologetics is massive.

Our children need to read John C. Calhoun and R. L. Dabney. They need to know the history of their nation. They need a healthy dose of the Anti-Federalist Papers (I had to search long and hard to find a copy for my sons). They need to read Jefferson Davis rather than read about him. They need to read accounts written by those who suffered through reconstruction. They need a healthy dose of the Nashville Agrarians. They need "Real History".   

Just because the college or university professors are read, does not mean that they know how to think, or that they are knowledgeable. They have their degrees due to having been indoctrinated in the prescribed methods at other schools.  A few brave professors are out there, providing a light of truth, and you may have to seek them out. Truth is too valuable to trust them blindly.

If we are to be an enlightened people, we need education. We need to know the facts and true accounting of history, rather than modern spin put on history. What were the poignant arguments and issues of the days of our forefathers? Those are the things we need to grasp.

Free Texas!

J Murrah

No Tags

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Should Southrons be vaccintated and other health issues

Published July 25th, 2007 in Political Well Being. 0 Comments

I often consider provocative items and how Southrons might consider them. Vaccinations is an area that often carries with it intense emotional reactions. When you consider that freedom to make healthcare decisions is part of our freedoms as well, this topic does come under the concerns of the League of the South. This topic along with access to treatments of our choice are issues that have been addressed among the League’s leadership.

The government and its ally in the pharmaceutical establishment are the main forces behind the push for immunizations. This same government is the one that brought you unprotected borders, tax support for criminal immigration, sending your tax dollars abroad to support corrupt regimes, funds for abortion, etc. When the track record is that they can not make good moral decisions about foreign policy or domestic policy, what makes you think that they have your children’s health as a main concern? When the government sets aside a fund to deal with vaccination mishaps (e.g. a hush fund), they know that the vaccinations are not safe. Vaccinations are a personal decision, to be made by the parents. It is not the government’s job to mandate these practices.

The people need to be free to make their own choices in such matters. Here is an article that addresses the vaccination scare tactics Vaccination Scare . If you really want some fun, consider why the government wants your child vaccinated before they enter the government indoctrination centers (public schools). They are considering public health. An un-vaccinated child presents a potential health hazard to those children who have been vaccinated.

Consider that children in the US are often given adult dosed vaccinations when they are young and their bodies are often not developed enough to handle it. It is through fear and intimidation from doctors and child welfare that forces many Southrons to submit to such practices. When decisions are coerced through fear and intimidation, it is not done of free will. Healthcare decisions need to be made with free will. Granted to make healthcare decisions, it requires the people be informed.  Many times people make poor healthcare choices, due to lack of information, not because of bad decision making.

If you have a chance to talk to your doctor and he is honest with you, he will tell you that in some areas (such as AIDS, infectious diseases, birth control, birth control devices, abortion and such issues), he is discouraged from frank and open discussion of the treatment options. Consider how the CDC has one set of reporting guidelines for infectious diseases other than AIDS and another procedure for AIDS.If AIDS is an infectious disease, shouldn’t the response to it be the same as with other infectious diseases?

Neither I nor the LOS will tell you what healthcare choices to make. It is a personal choice. What I can say is that it is NOT the government’s choice either. Government infringement on healthcare freedom is a loss of freedom in every sense as serious as property rights or gun rights. Since the public is often unaware of what treatment options exist, they do not know what to ask for or grow alarmed at what they can not do the same way they do when gun rights are threatened.  Presently the public is not able to access every treatment option available due to government interference. The FEDS and the medical establishment call it "protection". It is in the name of protection that the AMA has decided to OK the implanting of microchips as well.AMA endorses microchipping . If you do not see microchipping as an invasion of your rights, you are comatose on the issues. The AMA is making it clear what their priorities are. 

This post is not intended as medical advice. It is intended for information purposes only.

Free Texas! Freedom in thought, Freedom in healthcare, Freedom in choices.

J Murrah

No Tags

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Wake up and smell the coffee!

Published July 23rd, 2007 in Uncategorized. 0 Comments

I was exploring websites and saw something that made me shudder. The city of Oxford, Ohio conducted a law enforcement camp.Law_camp_logo Law Enforcement Camp . The camp teaches such things as building searches, SWAT, weapons training, etc. It is geared for police personnel. Part of what scares me is the similarity of the symbolism with the Nazi movement.Todt
The use of the eagle (even down to the direction he is facing), the gear, the ribbon. The similarities are spooky. When the camp is officially labeled the "Respect for Law Camp", I shudder at the message that is sent out.Reich

Here is a graphic from an American Nazi sight. The similarity in images with the ‘respect for law’ camp is easy to see. It is also chilling to note that the slogan of Hitler’s SA (storm troopers) was "fighting terror with terror".

Are these similarities by accident, or is there a similar attitude at work in the midst of these groups? Look and judge for yourself.

Wake Up Texas and be Free!

J Murrah

No Tags

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Why did Texas leave the Union?-Part III

Published July 23rd, 2007 in Economic Independence. 0 Comments

Texians,

Let us consider another reason that Texas left the Union. The tyrant Lincoln had called up 75,000 troops and sent them into the Confederacy without approval from Congress. He sent a significant number of troops into armed combat without approval. Mind you that no war was declared, he just sent troops. The southern states had chosen to leave the Union, and he used force to keep them from doing so. 75,000 troops is a lot of men. Sending such a large number sent a message. He was serious. He did not want to negotiate with the Confederacy, he wanted submission. He was not willing to work through Congress to achieve his goal. He was not open to political solutions. He wanted blood. His action showed a complete disregard for Congress, and the rule of law. He did not have the authority to send troops into harms way. He justified his actions saying that the Constitution gave him ‘war powers’. No other President had seen them in the Constitution before, but Lincoln, being the shyster lawyer he was, found hidden meaning in the document that gave him that authority to send men into harm’s way.

When Texas saw that Lincoln was not going to negotiate, and was not going to work within the law, they knew he was a loose cannon. They knew he was running renegade. If he was willing to send troops without authorization, there was not telling what else he was capable of doing. He was functioning as a dictator, out of control. (Is it any wonder that the current occupant of the White House admires Lincoln?). Lincoln was not going to respect the lawful secession of the Southern states from the damnable Union.

Lincoln’s sending of the 75,000 troops into the south was another one of the many reasons Texas left the Union.

Free Texas and Texas minds!

J Murrah

No Tags

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Why did Texas leave the Union?-Part II

Published July 19th, 2007 in Political Well Being. 4 Comments

In a conversation last month, I mentioned to someone that one of the reasons that Texas left the Union was the failure of the US government to protect the borders. He was surprised. He had never heard that before (probably another victim of government indoctrination). In the secession convention, the reasons for secession were laid out. One of those reasons was that the US government had not secured the border with Mexico. The US not only did not secure the border, the Congress never approved the funds to pay for border protection (deja vu-The current Congress has not approved monies for real border protection either).

Another related reason for leaving their stinking Union was that the US calvary was deliberately slow in responding to Indian threats and raids in Texas. Communities do not tolerate a slow response time from police, and they did not like the slow response from the Feds either. When they had a crisis, they wanted the Feds to be there. The people joined the Union under the assumption that the US would provide such assistance. The US had promised the assistance, why did it take so long for them to respond? The people of Texas felt cheated on this matter. (Recall, that the US was notorious for not keeping their treaties and agreements with the Indians either). The cavalry assigned to Texas had good men in their units, but they did not respond with promptness.

Taken together, these two reasons, lack of border protection, and slow response to life threatening emergencies, suggest that there may have been some malfeasance on the part of the Federal government and that Texas had some legitimate reasons for wanting to leave the party.

Since we have been under 142 years of  Union occupation, have matters improved? Has the US  began border protection? Has the Congress even allocated funds for border protection? (They have probably sent them to some third world country to educate their kids on the glories of the American way of life.) Has the Federal government improved their responsiveness to life threatening situations? Have the Feds made living in Texas safer from attacks from gangs roaming the borders or uncivilized peoples? If you seriously consider these items you will find that there are many similarities between 1861 and 2007. Maybe it is time you joined the League of the South, or if you are a member start doing something more to make the Southern Republic a reality.

Free Texas!

J Murrah

No Tags

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Why did Texas leave the Union?-Part 1

Published July 18th, 2007 in Political Well Being. 0 Comments

Although government indoctrination centers (public schools) instruct the students in the fact that Texas left the Union, few look at the reasons why. There were 14 specific items identified as reasons for leaving the Union. Although the vote to leave the Union happened long ago, it was the last free election for the people of Texas. If you assume that a free election is an expression of the will of the people, then it was out last ‘de facto’ government. The forced union with the United States is a government ‘de jour’ (government of the day; or the present ruling government). Just because a government is in power does not mean it is legitimate. Its legitimacy rests in the use of force. This raises questions for Christians. Since we are to pray for our leaders, and our government, which government are we to pray for? The occupational government or the legitimate government? Jesus understood what it was like living in a land where the government is one of forced authority. His life provides a role model to emulate in looking for ways to deal with the present government ‘de jour’. Make no mistake, the government knows it true legal status. The Congress knowingly operates ’sine die’. "Sine die’ is a latin term meaning without a day. The Congress knows it has not operated on a Constitutional basis since the Southern states walked out, and it did not have the number of members to constitute a quorum.

Although learned politicians know this, they keep the illusion going concerning the legitimacy of the present government.If you believe the illusion, they manage to keep their legitimacy, if only by intimidation.

This kind of information is often kept out of the public eye, left only for legal scholars to debate in backrooms. Knowledge of these things is considered verbotten for the public, besides that, they believe that the uneducated and unthinking masses would not comprehend its significance anyway. If we as Texians are to reclaim and exercise our sovereignty, we need to understand these concepts and act accordingly. I will deal with some of the other historic issues underlying secession in the coming days.

For Texas!,

J Murrah

No Tags

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Flags of Slavery

Published July 16th, 2007 in Current Affairs. 0 Comments

Here it is the 21st century and the story below shows the nations where slavery and slave like conditions exist.Slavery Flags . These are the nations that condone slavery. Where are those who protest slavery when it comes to trading with these nations? Where are the boycotts against these nations? They are no where to be found. It must be easier to boycott South Carolina or Georgia and tell all the horrid tales of past sins rather than to do something about modern day slavery. If the individuals who cry loudest concerning the confederate flag were truly concerned about slavery, they would take action against these nations, where real slavery exists right now.

Free Dixie!

J Murrah

No Tags

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Find Out When We Post



Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner



Resources




None But Texians: A History of Terry's Texas Rangers


Texans Always Move Them: A True History of Texas

Join the LOS
http://rpc.technorati.com/rpc/ping